Difference between revisions of "Errata: Example 8.10 missing factor of v, a1 and a2 flipped"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Failed to parse (unknown function "\begin{bmatrix}"): {\displaystyle \begin{bmatrix} v \\ \phi \end{bmatrix} = -\underbrace{\begin{bmatrix} \lambda_1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \dfrac{a_2 l}{v_\text{r}^2} & \dfrac{a_1 l}{v_\text{r}\end{bmatrix} }_{K_\text{d}} \underbrace{\begin{bmatrix} x - v_\text{r} t \\ y - y_\text{r} \\ \theta}\end{bmatrix}_{e} + \underbrace{\begin{bmatrix} v_\text{r} \\ 0}\vphantom{\bmat{0 \\ 0 \\ 0}}\end{bmatrix}_{u_\text{d}}. }
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & -{\color{blue} v} \sin\theta \\ 0 & 0 & {\color{blue} v} \cos\theta \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} | \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & -{\color{blue} v} \sin\theta \\ 0 & 0 & {\color{blue} v} \cos\theta \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} | ||
\right|_{(x_\text{d}, u_\text{d})} | \right|_{(x_\text{d}, u_\text{d})} | ||
− | = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & v_\text{r} \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}, | + | = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & v_\text{r} \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}, |
</math></center> | </math></center> | ||
This leads to an error in the definition of <math>w_2</math> later in the example. In addition, the coefficients <math>a_1</math> and <math>a_2</math> are swapped, so the definition of <math>w_2</math> should be: | This leads to an error in the definition of <math>w_2</math> later in the example. In addition, the coefficients <math>a_1</math> and <math>a_2</math> are swapped, so the definition of <math>w_2</math> should be: | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
The final controller then becomes | The final controller then becomes | ||
<center><math> | <center><math> | ||
− | \begin{bmatrix} v \\ \phi} = | + | \begin{bmatrix} v \\ \phi \end{bmatrix} = |
-\underbrace{\begin{bmatrix} | -\underbrace{\begin{bmatrix} | ||
\lambda_1 & 0 & 0 \\ | \lambda_1 & 0 & 0 \\ |
Revision as of 04:50, 7 October 2021
Chapter | Output Feedback |
---|---|
Page | 8-28 |
Line | -4 |
Version | 3.1.5 |
Date | 6 Oct 2021 |
Example 8.10 (Steering control with velocity scheduling) is missing a factor of in the definition of that propagates through the example. In addition, the coefficients and are swapped in the definition of .
The equation for should read:
This leads to an error in the definition of later in the example. In addition, the coefficients and are swapped, so the definition of should be:
The final controller then becomes