Difference between revisions of "Frequency Domain Design"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tag: Undo |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Chapter contents=# Sensitivity Functions | |Chapter contents=# Sensitivity Functions | ||
# Performance Specifications | # Performance Specifications | ||
| + | #* Response to Reference Signals | ||
| + | #* Response to Load Disturbances and Measurement Noise | ||
| + | #* Measuring Specifications | ||
# Feedback Design via Loop Shaping | # Feedback Design via Loop Shaping | ||
| + | #* Design Considerations | ||
| + | #* Lead and Lag Compensation | ||
# Feedforward Design | # Feedforward Design | ||
| + | #* Combining Feedforward and Feedback | ||
| + | #* Difficulties with Feedforward | ||
| + | #* Approximate Inverses | ||
# The Root Locus Method | # The Root Locus Method | ||
# Design Example | # Design Example | ||
Latest revision as of 16:37, 24 November 2024
| Prev: PID Control | Chapter 12 - Frequency Domain Design | Next: Robust Performance |
In this chapter we continue to explore the use of frequency domain techniques with a focus on the design of feedback systems. We begin with a more thorough description of the performance specifications for control systems and then introduce the concept of “loop shaping” as a mechanism for designing controllers in the frequency domain. Additional techniques discussed in this chapter include feedforward compensation, the root locus method, and nested controller design.
Contents
- Sensitivity Functions
- Performance Specifications
- Response to Reference Signals
- Response to Load Disturbances and Measurement Noise
- Measuring Specifications
- Feedback Design via Loop Shaping
- Design Considerations
- Lead and Lag Compensation
- Feedforward Design
- Combining Feedforward and Feedback
- Difficulties with Feedforward
- Approximate Inverses
- The Root Locus Method
- Design Example
- Further Reading
- Exercises